In Vitro Mutagenesis:


Natural mutation, in general, is spontaneous.  Any heritable change is considered as mutation.  It can be spontaneous or induced.  Mutation cannot be predicted in nature.  Mutation at chromosomal level can be numerical (ploidy) or it can be structural (aberrations).  At molecular level mutation can be deletion of a sequence of nucleotide or nucleotides, or addition of nucleotide or nucleotides, translocation of DNA segments with in the chromosome or between chromosomes or it can be due to inversion of DNA segments. 

Point mutations are generally restricted to changes in a single nucleotide i.e. substitution of a nucleotide or addition of nucleotide or loss of a single nucleotide.

Mutation can lead to gain of a function called Gain mutation, or loss of a function called null mutation.  Mutation can conditional, where the effect of mutation is expressed or manifest only under certain condition.  Many mutations are spontaneously reversed called reverse mutations, but some mutations are suppressed called suppressor mutations.

The rate of mutations varies form one organism to another, which depends upon the phylogenetic and hierarchical position of the organism.  In that sense viruses show greater propensity for changes than Bacterial systems.  And bacterial systems are prone to mutations than higher organisms.  Haploids suffer more than diploids due to mutation of one or the other kind. 

All natural mutations are unpredictable and spontaneous and it is the primary force of nature that caused variations and those variations survived the test of the time are fixed and furthered, thus species originated in nature.  Today molecular technology that is available at hand can be used create desirable mutation under in vitro condition.  It is not just creating random mutations; it is now possible to create mutations to create new codons, new messages and new characters.  This is possible to target a single nucleotide or a group of nucleotides.  In this process one can change a single codon or add one or more codons and delete one or more codons.  Such changes in coding sequence of a particular gene can generate a protein with new conformation or new function or both; in essential it amounts to protein engineering.

Protein engineering is an emerging technology of great importance in medicine and industry.  By this technology one can enable the protein to be stable at higher temperature and still active in non-aqueous conditions.  One can make the protein to change its affinity to the substrate and increase the activity by several folds at low Km. It is also possible to change its specificity of the substrate and function.  This is going to be one of the futuristic aspects of biotechnology.


Application of Site Directed Mutagenesis:


·       Proteins stable and functional at high temperatures.

·       Proteins stable and functional at changed pH.

·       Proteins active in non-aqueous solvents.

·       Proteins don’t require cofactors for their function.

·       Proteins resistance to proteases.

·       Proteins with changed allosteric features.

·       Proteins with changed active site and increased specific activity.

·       Proteins with changed Km and Vmax with increased catalytic efficiency.


A list of few engineered proteins:

·       Alpha Amylase- used in bear making.

·       Subtisilin-biodetergent.

·       Amino cyclase- Preparation of L-amino acids.

·       Bromelain- Meat tenderizer and juice clarifier.

·       Catalase- anti oxidant in food preparation.

·       Ficin- meat tenderizer.

·       Cellulase- alcohol and glucose production.

·       Gluco amylase- beer making and other EtOH products.

·       Glucose oxidase- anti oxidant in food processing.

·       Invertase- sucrose inversion.

·       Lipase- cheese making and flavoring.

·       Papain- meat tenderizer and juice clarifier.

·       Pectinase- juice clarifier.

·       Protease- detergent preparation.

·       Rennet- cheese making.

·       Now it can be more than thousand,


            How proteins are engineered:



In Vitro Random Mutation:

First method:


Using chemicals creates mutation, but the site of mutation is random.  Whether or not in vitro mutation has any desirable feature is perhaps a chance.



In order to induce mutations, obtain ssDNA from M13/18 plasmids with a gene of interest.


The ssDNA is subjected very low level of sodium bisulfate under controlled conditions such that the number of sites mutated will be very very minimal.  Sodium bisulfate deaminates cytosine residues to uracil.  When the DNA containing uracil replicates it produces DNA with Adenine in place of uracil.  Thus whatever limited numbers of cytosine residues converted into adenines change the message, so also the protein product.

Such deaminated and oxygenated ssDNA is copied into dsDNA by using an universal primer.  Such replicative form DNA is used for bacterial transformation.  Then the colonies are screened for any mutation.  This way one can generate a large number of point mutation.


Second method:

Some of the E.coli strains such as Ung ( – )and Dut(+)  are very useful in obtaining in vitro mutation, again it is random.  Ung strains are incapable of removing uracil nucleotides from the DNA by deglycosylation reaction.  Dut strains are lacking UTPase, thus the concentration of UTP inc5reases and UTPs are incorporated into the DNA.  But Ung+ and Dut + strains have functional enzymes.

If a M13/18 plasmid containing a specific gene is used to transform double mutant strain, UTPs are incorporated into the replicating DNA and incorporated UTPs are not removed by N’deglycosylases, because of defective enzymes.

Obtain positive ssDNA from M13/18 transformed strains and using universal primers generate ds DNA.

Digest the plasmid in order to release the insert and clone the same into another plasmid and transform Ung + and Dut – bacterial strains.  As the plasmid DNA replicates all the Us are removed by deglycosylases and the replicated plasmid is obtained.

Obtain the plasmids and release the insert and recline the gene and analyze for the random mutants.


Site directed Mutagenesis:

 If the sequence of the desired DNA is known, from that one can find out certain restriction enzyme sites.  For example within the gene of interest, assume there is one E.coR I site; the sequence of it is GAATTC.

If the site is cut with E.coR I enzyme it generates 5’ overhangs in both strands of the DNA.

            ----5’G            AATTC---3’

            ----3’CTTAA            G---5’


If such DNA with sticky ends is treated with S1 nuclease it removes the overhangs to blunt ends.


            -----5’G      C---3’

            -----3’C      G----5’

When such ends are ligated one gets the DNA with 5’GC3’ sequences and four base pairs are lost.  This leads not only to deletions but also changes the reading frame.

Similarly if the cut ends are treated with T4 DNA polymerase with dNTPs, the enzyme fills the gaps of each ends by extending the cut ends by 5’à3’ direction to produce blunt ends.  If such blunt ends are ligated they generate 5’GAATTAATTC3’.  In this four base pairs are added.  Again this causes the addition and the reading frame is changed.  Mostly this kind of changes doesn’t produce any functional protein, if by chance the changed reading frame works you are in luck.


Image result for In Vitro Mutagenesis with added nucleotides

Site directed mutagenesis;






Method II:


Image result for In Vitro Mutagenesis with added nucleotides


In this case the change is directed to one or more specific nucleotides thus one can change only one of the codons.  For example one wants to change Phenyl alanine (UUU) to Cysteine (UGU), design primers in such a way UUU is changed to UGU, where with exception of one nucleotide others are complementary to the nucleotides on either side of the said nucleotide.


            3’   AAAà

            Primer to the bottom strand- wit5h changed nucleotide-----5’UGUà

            Primer to the top strand   with changed nucleotide   -----    -<-ACA 5’


Melt the DNA to ssDNA and anneal the primer to the strands not to a state of stringency.  This will provide an opportunity for the base pairs, which are not complementary, remain unpaired.  Amplify the DNA using PCR protocols.  Then melt the DNA to single strands and anneal them at high Tm for stringency.

Then use the plasmids and transform them and look for the change in the codon.


Another way is to have marker in the DNA which one wants to use for site directed mutation.   Take a plasmid with the desired gene and a marker out side the gene such as a restriction site which can be cut with only Dpn-I.  Use the primers and amplify the DNA.  Then melt the DNA and Anneal.  The parental strands anneal and new strands anneals by themselves.  After annealing the DNA strands, cut the dsDNA with Dpn-I.  The new strands have no Dpn-I site for the enzyme requires methylated sites, otherwise it does not recognize the site.  Thus only the parental strands are cut, but not the new strands.  When such DNA is used for bacterial transformation the cut DNA cannot transform and the uncut DNA transforms bacteria, thus one obtains the DNA with changed sequence to generate a new codon.


Image result for Deletion Mutagenesis

Deletion mutagenesis; in our study, we have analyzed mitochondrial DNA deletion breakpoints and mitochondrial genomes from four different mammals: human, rhesus monkey, mouse and rat. Our analysis gave evidence for the causal role of DRs in the formation of age-related mtDNA deletions, only among the long-living mammals, i.e. human and monkey. A further analysis of the lifespans and mtDNA sequences of 294 mammalian and 236 avian species, the most comprehensive of such analysis to date, further showed that contrary to a long-held hypothesis, the number of DRs is not a specific, evolutionarily selected feature of mtDNA. Instead, DRs form as an indirect consequence of bias in nucleotide composition and in synonymous codon usage. Taken together, our findings reveal a lack of negative selection pressure against DR motifs in mtDNA, even among long-lived species, despite their role in mtDNA deletion formation; Lakshmi Narayan;


YRT deleted mutant mices;



Image result for Oligo based mutagenesis

Oligo based mutagenesis;


Image result for PCR mutagenesis